NERALVO
Product review

Fieldy 3 Review 2026: Wearable AI Notetaker vs NERALVO Halo

By NERALVO Editorial Team Published Reviewed 4 minute read

The 60-second verdict

Quick answer: Fieldy 3 is a 17g wearable AI notetaker that can be worn as a pendant or watch. Fieldy publishes up to seven days of battery, up to three-hour conversations, three days of offline conversation storage, IP65 splash resistance and 100+ transcription languages.

Best fit: users who want a lightweight wearable and searchable transcripts rather than a permanent personal library of source-audio files.

Current specification

Dimensions 29 × 29 × 11mm
Weight 17g
Battery Up to 7 days
Conversation limit Up to 3h each
Offline storage Up to 3 days of conversations
Water resistance IP65
Languages 100+
Recording indicator Fieldy lets the user disable the LED entirely in device settings

Strengths

  • Long wearable battery claim.
  • Pendant/watch flexibility.
  • Real-time transcription and summaries.
  • Transcript-first privacy design for ordinary personal use.

Limitations

  • Three-hour session cap.
  • Normal sync/AI workflow needs phone/app/internet.
  • For ordinary personal use, deleted audio cannot be replayed later.
  • Organisation deployments can work differently: Fieldy's current privacy policy says transcripts and audio recordings may be shared with the organisation under a separate agreement.
  • The recording LED can be switched off completely. Fieldy's guide describes this as discreet/stealth use. A hidden indicator does not remove participant-notice, workplace-policy or legal obligations.

Fieldy 3 vs Halo

Need Fieldy 3 Halo
Wearable battery Up to 7 days Dedicated recorder, up to 35h recording
Personal-use audio retention Deleted after processing according to Fieldy 64GB local recording storage
Organisation deployment Separate agreement may permit transcript/audio delivery to organisation Check organisation policy and chosen app workflow
Visible recording indicator User can disable Fieldy LED Use an explicit participant-notice process regardless of device indicator
Format Pendant/watch Magnetic card

Fieldy is stronger for lightweight transcript-first memory. Halo is stronger when the source recording itself needs to remain available. For business deployment, the privacy comparison must be made against the organisation-specific Fieldy agreement rather than the consumer workflow alone.

Privacy, data handling and recording visibility

Fieldy's 27 August 2026 privacy policy says personal-use audio is sent to transcription providers or processed by Fieldy's own models and deleted when no longer needed. It also says speaker-recognition profiles are biometric data and are generated only with explicit consent. Organisation users have a separate sharing exception, so employers and teams should document what is delivered to their systems, who can access it and how long it is retained.

Fieldy's current device guide also lets users turn the recording light off, suppressing the LED entirely. That can be convenient in visually distracting environments, but it also removes a passive cue that other people might otherwise notice. NERALVO therefore treats participant notice as an explicit workflow requirement rather than something a status light can solve.

Six tests before deploying Fieldy 3

  1. Recording visibility: test the default LED-on state and any deliberately configured LED-off state, then confirm the participant-notice process works independently of the light.
  2. Session boundary: run a representative long conversation and verify what happens as the published three-hour conversation limit is approached.
  3. Wearable acoustics: compare pendant and watch placement while seated, walking and wearing normal clothing to identify movement or contact noise.
  4. Offline recovery: capture while disconnected, retain several conversations offline, reconnect later and verify that sync completes without losing the source needed for processing.
  5. Personal-use retention: confirm when source audio is deleted, what transcript remains and whether the lack of later source-audio replay is acceptable for the intended work.
  6. Organisation deployment: if an employer or team supplies Fieldy, review the exact organisation agreement and test who can access transcripts/audio, how long data is retained and what users are told in-product.

Official sources

Verdict: Fieldy 3 has a clear transcript-first philosophy for personal use. Whether that is an advantage or a deal-breaker depends on evidence needs; organisation sharing and the ability to disable the recording LED make explicit governance and participant notice especially important.

Optional comparison

Compare the same workflow with NERALVO Halo

Use the evidence and acceptance tests in this review first. Then compare Halo’s 64GB local storage, NOTE/supported CALL workflow, up-to-35-hour published recording time and current included service on the same requirements.

View Halo specifications and current offer

Found an error or an out-of-date claim? Email support@neralvo.com with the article address and a supporting source.

Buyer questions

Frequently asked questions

What should I verify before buying this competitor?

Verify the exact current SKU, recording route, source-audio access, export and deletion process, monthly AI allowance and total software cost on the official vendor page.

Are the battery and pickup figures guaranteed?

No. Unless the article explicitly identifies an independent test, treat headline battery and pickup figures as manufacturer-published maxima that need representative testing.

Why does this review compare the product with NERALVO Halo?

NERALVO sells Halo and discloses that commercial interest. The comparison is intended to identify workflow trade-offs rather than force a NERALVO win.

Evidence snapshot

Fieldy 3: what is verified, what is conditional

Evidence mix: Current first-party documentation plus dated external evidence where available.

Confirmed

Supported by the current evidence

The exact product identity and current headline specifications are tied to dated sources in the article.

The comparison keeps manufacturer claims separate from independently demonstrated findings.

Conditional

Do not overclaim this

Battery, pickup range, transcription quality and long-term software terms remain conditional until tested in the buyer’s workflow.

Acceptance test

Prove this before relying on it

Run the exact recording route, transfer/export path, recovery process and monthly AI workload before relying on the product.

Decision gate

  • Choose Fieldy 3 when its specialist workflow solves the buyer’s main problem better.
  • Choose NERALVO Halo when a simpler 64GB magnetic recorder with up to 35 hours of published recording time and the current one-year DOWAY Max bundle fits better.
  • Choose neither yet if source-audio access, call compatibility, export/recovery, privacy requirements or two-year software cost are still unproven for the actual workload.

Evidence and freshness

Competitor-review evidence and sources

Reviewed: . Prices, subscriptions, compatibility, privacy terms and software features can change. Check the official vendor links in this article before acting on time-sensitive information.

Commercial disclosure: NERALVO sells Halo. These reviews therefore have a commercial interest. A supplier specification establishes what that supplier currently claims; it does not prove independent battery life, pickup range, transcription accuracy, privacy quality or value.

Hands-on rule: do not treat a conclusion as NERALVO-tested unless the article states the device/software version, test date, setup, representative source recordings, measurements and retained original evidence. Otherwise the assessment remains desk research.

Established NERALVO comparisons

More relevant NERALVO competitor reviews