NERALVO
NERALVO guide

How to Build a Custom Vocabulary List for AI Transcription

By NERALVO Editorial Team Published Reviewed 4 minute read

The 60-second verdict

Quick answer: build a custom vocabulary list for AI transcription by selecting frequent high-impact terms, recording approved spellings and context, separating shared and restricted entries, testing representative audio and assigning an owner and review date.

Decision focus: use the method below only where it produces a recoverable source, a verifiable output and a clear next action. If one of those fails, change the workflow rather than trusting a polished summary.

Evidence basis and limits

  • Decision factors covered: Choose high-value entries; Use complete glossary fields; Separate shared and restricted vocabulary.
  • Evidence rule: The decision is based on the complete capture-to-action workflow, not a single feature or marketing accuracy percentage.
  • Boundary: Examples and workflow recommendations must be tested with representative recordings, the intended users and the actual approval process before rollout.

The best vocabulary list is not the largest. It is small, verified, relevant and measured. An uncontrolled glossary can create false replacements and expose unnecessary personal or confidential information.

Custom vocabulary list infographic covering high-value terms, glossary fields, sensitive-data minimisation, representative testing and lifecycle control.
A useful vocabulary list reduces repeated high-impact errors without becoming a noisy or sensitive database.

Choose high-value entries

Prioritise terms that are frequent, important and often misheard:

  • organisation and product names;
  • approved acronyms and expansions;
  • equipment, medicine or technical terms;
  • project and service names;
  • places and controlled codes;
  • recurring participant names where necessary and authorised.

Avoid adding every word that appears once.

Use complete glossary fields

Field Purpose
Preferred term Approved spelling or form
Likely errors Common transcript variants
Meaning and context Prevents the wrong substitution
Source Authoritative reference
Owner and review date Maintains lifecycle control

Separate shared and restricted vocabulary

Shared entries may include brand, product and general technical terms. Customer, patient, employee, case or security-related names may require a restricted, purpose-specific list—or should not be stored at all.

Separate permanent and temporary entries

Permanent vocabulary may cover stable organisational language. Temporary lists may support a project, event or participant group. Give temporary entries an expiry date and delete them when the purpose ends.

Test effectiveness before rollout

Use representative recordings containing target terms and compare:

  • critical-term recognition;
  • false substitutions;
  • correction time;
  • consistency across speakers and environments;
  • new errors introduced.

Test the exact devices, languages and processing settings used in practice.

Monitor unintended effects

A glossary may cause the system to insert a preferred term where a common word was spoken. Track false positives and remove entries that create more correction than they prevent.

Control additions and removals

Require a source and reason for material changes. Assign one owner, maintain version history and retire obsolete products, staff names and project codes.

Connect the glossary to correction data

Review recent transcript correction logs to identify repeated errors. Do not add terms based only on opinion. Measure whether the entry reduces real correction work.

Workflow choice matrix for How to Build a Custom Vocabulary List for AI Transcription

Choose the method that protects the source and reduces downstream correction. The table makes the non-hardware options explicit.

Condition Preferred route Why
Repeatable remote work with approved integrations Cloud software Automation and central collaboration may outweigh device independence.
In-person, mobile or unreliable-connectivity work Dedicated recorder Independent capture and a recoverable local source are usually more resilient.
Recording is refused, prohibited or unnecessary Manual notes / no recording Respecting the boundary is the correct workflow, not a product failure.
High-risk or mixed work Governed hybrid Separate capture, review, approval and retention rather than trusting one tool.

Frequently asked questions

Should every customer name be added?

No. Add personal names only where necessary, proportionate and appropriately restricted.

How large should the list be?

As small as possible while covering frequent, high-impact errors.

How do you know it works?

Compare critical-term accuracy, false substitutions and correction time before and after use.

Useful resources

Final vocabulary checklist

  • Entries frequent and high impact
  • Spellings, meanings and sources verified
  • Sensitive content minimised
  • Temporary entries expire
  • Representative testing completed
  • False substitutions monitored
  • Owner and review date assigned
Optional next step

See whether Halo fits this workflow

Review the NERALVO Halo specifications, included services, delivery information and current offer only after completing the guide.

Found an error or an out-of-date claim? Email support@neralvo.com with the article address and a supporting source.

Evidence and freshness

What to re-check before relying on this guide

Article record last updated . Re-check any current price, plan, compatibility, policy or product claim at the linked official source.

Sources checked 24 August 2026. The ICO source supports the privacy and personal-data boundary for recordings and transcripts. The UK Government AI Playbook supports representative testing, performance monitoring and controlled changes to AI-enabled workflows. Topic-specific regulator, supplier and attributed hands-on sources appear below when the article needs them.

Evidence boundary: use current primary documentation for changing facts and test the workflow with representative recordings before depending on it.

Open official sources and attributed external evidence

Manufacturer claims and current plan facts are labelled as such. AI output is not treated as a source. Corrections: support@neralvo.com.